2006 Chevrolet Epica vs. 2005 Smart Coupe
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Smart Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Smart Coupe would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Epica (154 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 2005 Smart Coupe. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Epica should accelerate faster than 2005 Smart Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 845 kg more than 2005 Smart Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Epica (237 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Smart Coupe. (95 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Smart Coupe.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Epica | 2005 Smart Coupe | |
Make | Chevrolet | Smart |
Model | Epica | Coupe |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
Top Speed | 208 km/hour | 135 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.9 seconds | 15.5 seconds |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 730 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 33 L |