2006 Chevrolet Epica vs. 2008 Rover 75

To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet Epica would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 50 kg more than 2008 Rover 75.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Rover 75 (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet Epica. (237 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet Epica.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Chevrolet Epica 2008 Rover 75
Make Chevrolet Rover
Model Epica 75
Year Released 2006 2008
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2491 cc 2497 cc
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 154 HP 0 HP
Torque 237 Nm 240 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 77 mm 80 mm
Engine Stroke Size 89.2 mm 82.8 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.8:1 10.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Top Speed 208 km/hour 220 km/hour
Acceleration 0-100mph 9.9 seconds 8.8 seconds
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1575 kg 1525 kg
Vehicle Length 4810 mm 4000 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2750 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 9.3 L/100km 9.9 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 65 L