2006 Chevrolet Epica vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet Epica would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cadenza (200 HP) has 46 more horse power than 2006 Chevrolet Epica. (154 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 2006 Chevrolet Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Epica | 2010 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | Chevrolet | Kia |
Model | Epica | Cadenza |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2845 mm |