2006 Chevrolet Epica vs. 2012 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2012 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet Epica would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot RCZ (197 HP) has 43 more horse power than 2006 Chevrolet Epica. (154 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot RCZ should accelerate faster than 2006 Chevrolet Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Chevrolet Epica has automatic transmission and 2012 Peugeot RCZ has manual transmission. 2012 Peugeot RCZ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Chevrolet Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Epica | 2012 Peugeot RCZ | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Peugeot |
| Model | Epica | RCZ |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 208 km/hour | 217 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.9 seconds | 7.6 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4287 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1845 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1359 mm |
