2006 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 695 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo.
Because 2006 Chevrolet Equinox is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Chevrolet Equinox has automatic transmission and 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo has manual transmission. 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Chevrolet Equinox will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Equinox | 1982 Mitsubishi Sapporo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Equinox | Sapporo |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3425 cc | 1797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 186 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1055 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2520 mm |
