2006 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 2002 Ford Ka

To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Ka would be higher. At 3,350 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ka. (135 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 614 kg more than 2002 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ka. (175 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ka. 2006 Chevrolet Equinox has automatic transmission and 2002 Ford Ka has manual transmission. 2002 Ford Ka will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Chevrolet Equinox will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Chevrolet Equinox 2002 Ford Ka
Make Chevrolet Ford
Model Equinox Ka
Year Released 2006 2002
Body Type SUV Roadster
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3350 cc 1596 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 185 HP 135 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 285 Nm 175 Nm
Torque RPM 3800 RPM 4250 RPM
Engine Bore Size 92 mm 82.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84.1 mm 75.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1750 kg 1136 kg
Vehicle Length 4800 mm 3660 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1710 mm 1340 mm
Wheelbase Size 2860 mm 2450 mm
Fuel Consumption City 12.4 L/100km 10.6 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 7.8 L/100km 7.9 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 42 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]