2006 Chevrolet Evanda vs. 1989 Mazda 323
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Evanda is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Evanda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Mazda 323 (131 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2006 Chevrolet Evanda. (119 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Mazda 323 should accelerate faster than 2006 Chevrolet Evanda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Evanda weights approximately 432 kg more than 1989 Mazda 323.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Evanda | 1989 Mazda 323 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Evanda | 323 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1840 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 131 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 85 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 1065 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2460 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 50 L |
