2006 Chevrolet Evanda vs. 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Evanda is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Evanda is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 408 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet Evanda.
Because 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Chevrolet Evanda. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer (382 Nm) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet Evanda. (176 Nm). This means 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet Evanda.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Evanda | 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Evanda | Lancer |
Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 382 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 85.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 87.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 1905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 71 L |