2006 Chevrolet Evanda vs. 2003 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Evanda is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Kangoo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Kangoo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Evanda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Evanda (119 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2003 Renault Kangoo. (64 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Evanda should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Kangoo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Evanda (176 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Kangoo. (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Evanda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Kangoo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Evanda | 2003 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Evanda | Kangoo |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1783 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 21.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2630 mm |