2006 Chevrolet Evanda vs. 2011 Tata Nano
To start off, 2011 Tata Nano is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet Evanda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet Evanda would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Evanda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Evanda (119 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2011 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Evanda should accelerate faster than 2011 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Evanda weights approximately 897 kg more than 2011 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Evanda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Evanda (176 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Evanda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Evanda | 2011 Tata Nano | |
Make | Chevrolet | Tata |
Model | Evanda | Nano |
Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 48 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.8 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 37 L |