2006 Chevrolet Express vs. 1963 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Express is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 4,800 cc, 2006 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Express (285 HP) has 232 more horse power than 1963 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Express should accelerate faster than 1963 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 98 kg more than 1963 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Express (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Express will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Express | 1963 Zastava 1300 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Zastava |
| Model | Express | 1300 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 4800 cc | 1295 cc |
| Horse Power | 285 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1078 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 2430 mm |
