2006 Chevrolet Express vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet Express. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet Express would be higher. At 5,324 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 909 kg more than 2010 Volvo C30.
Because 2006 Chevrolet Express is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Volvo C30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Express will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Express | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | Express | C30 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5324 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 295 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2360 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 3.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 60 L |
