2006 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1950 Mercury Roadster
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Mercury Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Mercury Roadster would be higher. At 3,990 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Mercury Roadster is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet HHR (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1950 Mercury Roadster. (108 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1950 Mercury Roadster.
Because 1950 Mercury Roadster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Mercury Roadster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet HHR | 1950 Mercury Roadster | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercury |
Model | HHR | Roadster |
Year Released | 2006 | 1950 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2194 cc | 3990 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2960 mm |