2006 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1952 MG TD
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 MG TD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 MG TD would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1952 MG TD is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 MG TD. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet HHR (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 MG TD. (87 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 MG TD.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet HHR | 1952 MG TD | |
| Make | Chevrolet | MG |
| Model | HHR | TD |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1952 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1250 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 87 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2390 mm |
