2006 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1953 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet HHR (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1953 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford 12 M.
Because 1953 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Chevrolet HHR has automatic transmission and 1953 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1953 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Chevrolet HHR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet HHR | 1953 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | HHR | 12 M |
Year Released | 2006 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2196 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1620 mm |