2006 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1959 DAF 600
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 DAF 600 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1959 DAF 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 DAF 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet HHR (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 DAF 600. (45 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet HHR | 1959 DAF 600 | |
Make | Chevrolet | DAF |
Model | HHR | 600 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 19 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 45 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 7.1:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 28 L |