2006 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1962 Dodge Polara
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,905 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Dodge Polara (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 2006 Chevrolet HHR. (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 2006 Chevrolet HHR.
Because 1962 Dodge Polara is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Dodge Polara. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet HHR | 1962 Dodge Polara | |
Make | Chevrolet | Dodge |
Model | HHR | Polara |
Year Released | 2006 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2196 cc | 5905 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2960 mm |