2006 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1963 Ford Taunus
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 2,194 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet HHR (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1963 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Taunus.
Because 1963 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet HHR | 1963 Ford Taunus | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | HHR | Taunus |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2194 cc | 1183 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 80.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 58.9 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 50 L |
