2006 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1967 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,194 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet HHR (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1967 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1967 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet HHR (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet HHR | 1967 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
Model | HHR | 2000 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2194 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 76 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 64 L |