2006 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1969 Dodge Challenger

To start off, 2006 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 7,206 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (317 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 2006 Chevrolet HHR. (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2006 Chevrolet HHR.

Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (545 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 342 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet HHR. (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet HHR.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Chevrolet HHR 1969 Dodge Challenger
Make Chevrolet Dodge
Model HHR Challenger
Year Released 2006 1969
Body Type Hatchback Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2194 cc 7206 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 143 HP 317 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 203 Nm 545 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3200 RPM
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 4870 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1940 mm
Vehicle Height 1610 mm 1290 mm
Wheelbase Size 2640 mm 2800 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 61 L 75 L