2006 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1973 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1973 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1973 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet HHR (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet HHR | 1973 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | HHR | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2480 mm |