2006 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1980 Daihatsu Taft
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet HHR (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. (44 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1980 Daihatsu Taft.
Because 1980 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Chevrolet HHR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet HHR (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. (63 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Daihatsu Taft.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet HHR | 1980 Daihatsu Taft | |
Make | Chevrolet | Daihatsu |
Model | HHR | Taft |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Engine Size | 2196 cc | 956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 63 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2030 mm |