2006 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1983 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1983 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1983 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet HHR | 1983 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
| Model | HHR | XJR |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 5343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2870 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 90 L |
