2006 Chevrolet HHR vs. 1983 Renault Rodeo
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Renault Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Renault Rodeo would be higher. At 2,194 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet HHR (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1983 Renault Rodeo. (34 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1983 Renault Rodeo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet HHR (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Renault Rodeo. (75 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Renault Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet HHR | 1983 Renault Rodeo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | HHR | Rodeo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2194 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 75 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 72 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 34 L |