2006 Chevrolet HHR vs. 2000 Lotus Extreme
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lotus Extreme. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lotus Extreme would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Lotus Extreme is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lotus Extreme. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet HHR (203 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus Extreme. (180 Nm). This means 2006 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus Extreme. 2006 Chevrolet HHR has automatic transmission and 2000 Lotus Extreme has manual transmission. 2000 Lotus Extreme will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Chevrolet HHR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet HHR | 2000 Lotus Extreme | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
| Model | HHR | Extreme |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 700 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 120 HP |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2420 mm |
