2006 Chevrolet HHR vs. 2008 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2008 Isuzu KB is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet HHR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet HHR would be higher. At 3,165 cc, 2008 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Isuzu KB is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Chevrolet HHR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Isuzu KB will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Isuzu KB (265 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet HHR. (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Isuzu KB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet HHR. 2006 Chevrolet HHR has automatic transmission and 2008 Isuzu KB has manual transmission. 2008 Isuzu KB will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Chevrolet HHR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet HHR | 2008 Isuzu KB | |
Make | Chevrolet | Isuzu |
Model | HHR | KB |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2194 cc | 3165 cc |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 265 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 17.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 75 L |