2006 Chevrolet HHR vs. 2010 Renault Symbol
To start off, 2010 Renault Symbol is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet HHR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet HHR would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet HHR (143 HP) has 69 more horse power than 2010 Renault Symbol. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Symbol.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet HHR (203 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Symbol. (105 Nm). This means 2006 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Symbol.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet HHR | 2010 Renault Symbol | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | HHR | Symbol |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2196 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 105 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4261 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1639 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1439 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2473 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.8 L/100km | 5.9 L/100km |