2006 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1950 Holden FX
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 3,884 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (240 HP) has 189 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX.
Because 1950 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (328 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Impala | 1950 Holden FX | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Impala | FX |
Year Released | 2006 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3884 cc | 2165 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 328 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2620 mm |