2006 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1952 Skoda 1200
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Skoda 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Skoda 1200 would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (200 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1952 Skoda 1200. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1952 Skoda 1200.
Because 1952 Skoda 1200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Skoda 1200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (298 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Skoda 1200. (75 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Skoda 1200.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Impala | 1952 Skoda 1200 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Skoda |
Model | Impala | 1200 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1221 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 75 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2690 mm |