2006 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1958 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (200 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1958 Talbot T 26. (197 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1958 Talbot T 26.
Because 1958 Talbot T 26 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Talbot T 26. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Chevrolet Impala has automatic transmission and 1958 Talbot T 26 has manual transmission. 1958 Talbot T 26 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Chevrolet Impala will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Impala | 1958 Talbot T 26 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Talbot |
Model | Impala | T 26 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1958 |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 4482 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1890 mm |