2006 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1959 MG MGA
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 MG MGA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 MG MGA would be higher. At 3,884 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1959 MG MGA. (71 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1959 MG MGA.
Because 1959 MG MGA is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 MG MGA. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (328 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 MG MGA. (104 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 MG MGA.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Impala | 1959 MG MGA | |
Make | Chevrolet | MG |
Model | Impala | MGA |
Year Released | 2006 | 1959 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3884 cc | 1489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 328 Nm | 104 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 10.6 L/100km |