2006 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1964 Holden EH
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 3,884 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1964 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EH.
Because 1964 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (328 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EH. (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EH.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Impala | 1964 Holden EH | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Impala | EH |
Year Released | 2006 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3884 cc | 2928 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 328 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2670 mm |