2006 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1965 Citroen 2CV
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 5,326 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (304 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 286 more horse power than 1965 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen 2CV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Chevrolet Impala has automatic transmission and 1965 Citroen 2CV has manual transmission. 1965 Citroen 2CV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Chevrolet Impala will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Impala | 1965 Citroen 2CV | |
Make | Chevrolet | Citroen |
Model | Impala | 2CV |
Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5326 cc | 425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 304 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 19 L |