2006 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (200 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger.
Because 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Impala | 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Chevrolet | Sunbeam |
Model | Impala | Tiger |
Year Released | 2006 | 1966 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 4259 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 27 L |