2006 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1972 Holden Torana
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Holden Torana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Holden Torana would be higher. At 3,884 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1972 Holden Torana. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1972 Holden Torana.
Because 1972 Holden Torana is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Holden Torana. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (328 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Holden Torana. (131 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Holden Torana.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Impala | 1972 Holden Torana | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Impala | Torana |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3884 cc | 1599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 240 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 328 Nm | 131 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2440 mm |
