2006 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1972 Sunbeam Alpine
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Sunbeam Alpine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Sunbeam Alpine would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (200 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1972 Sunbeam Alpine. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1972 Sunbeam Alpine.
Because 1972 Sunbeam Alpine is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Sunbeam Alpine. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (298 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Sunbeam Alpine. (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Sunbeam Alpine.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Impala | 1972 Sunbeam Alpine | |
Make | Chevrolet | Sunbeam |
Model | Impala | Alpine |
Year Released | 2006 | 1972 |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1725 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 123 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2510 mm |