2006 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1974 Holden Torana
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Holden Torana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Holden Torana would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (200 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1974 Holden Torana. (119 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1974 Holden Torana.
Because 1974 Holden Torana is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Holden Torana. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (298 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Holden Torana. (228 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Holden Torana.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Impala | 1974 Holden Torana | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Impala | Torana |
Year Released | 2006 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 2833 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 228 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2590 mm |