2006 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1976 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (200 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1976 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1976 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (298 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Impala | 1976 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Impala | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2480 mm |