2006 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1977 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 5,326 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (304 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1977 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1977 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (438 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 281 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Impala | 1977 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Impala | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5326 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 304 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 438 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2480 mm |
