2006 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1979 Bitter SC
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Bitter SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Bitter SC would be higher. At 3,884 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1979 Bitter SC. (177 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1979 Bitter SC.
Because 1979 Bitter SC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Bitter SC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (328 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Bitter SC. (248 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Bitter SC.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Impala | 1979 Bitter SC | |
Make | Chevrolet | Bitter |
Model | Impala | SC |
Year Released | 2006 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3884 cc | 2968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 328 Nm | 248 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2690 mm |