2006 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1980 Mazda 121
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 3,884 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1980 Mazda 121 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mazda 121. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Impala | 1980 Mazda 121 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Impala | 121 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3884 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2520 mm |