2006 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1982 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 3,884 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1982 Mercury Lynx. (70 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1982 Mercury Lynx.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (328 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mercury Lynx. (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Impala | 1982 Mercury Lynx | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercury |
Model | Impala | Lynx |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3884 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 328 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2400 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 43 L |