2006 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1983 Holden Camira
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Holden Camira would be higher. At 3,884 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1983 Holden Camira. (86 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1983 Holden Camira.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (328 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Holden Camira. (125 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Holden Camira.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Impala | 1983 Holden Camira | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Impala | Camira |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3884 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 240 HP | 86 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 328 Nm | 125 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2580 mm |
