2006 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1984 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1984 Rolls-Royce Corniche is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Rolls-Royce Corniche. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Impala | 1984 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Impala | Corniche |
Year Released | 2006 | 1984 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3030 mm |