2006 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1994 Mazda 121
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 3,884 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1994 Mazda 121. (72 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda 121.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (328 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda 121. (104 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda 121.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Impala | 1994 Mazda 121 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Impala | 121 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3884 cc | 1324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 328 Nm | 104 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 43 L |