2006 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 3,884 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (240 HP) has 45 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (195 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (328 Nm) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2006 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Impala | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Impala | FTO |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3884 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 240 HP | 195 HP |
| Torque | 328 Nm | 202 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1300 mm |
