2006 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1997 Ford F-250
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford F-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford F-250 would be higher. At 6,800 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford F-250 (306 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2006 Chevrolet Impala. (304 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 2006 Chevrolet Impala.
Because 1997 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Chevrolet Impala. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford F-250 (575 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet Impala. (438 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1997 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet Impala.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Impala | 1997 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Impala | F-250 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1997 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5326 cc | 6800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 304 HP | 306 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 438 Nm | 575 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 5760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3490 mm |