2006 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision would be higher. At 3,884 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision. (94 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision.
Because 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (328 Nm) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision. (189 Nm). This means 2006 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Impala | 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Impala | Vision |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3884 cc | 1899 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 240 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 328 Nm | 189 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2940 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 62 L |
