2006 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2002 Toyota FXS
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Toyota FXS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Toyota FXS would be higher. At 4,290 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Toyota FXS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2002 Toyota FXS. (197 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 2002 Toyota FXS.
Because 2002 Toyota FXS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Toyota FXS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (328 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Toyota FXS. (270 Nm). This means 2006 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Toyota FXS.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Impala | 2002 Toyota FXS | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Impala | FXS |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3884 cc | 4290 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 328 Nm | 270 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 55 L |