2006 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2006 Holden Caprice
To start off, both 2006 Chevrolet Impala and 2006 Holden Caprice were released in the same year (2006). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 5,326 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (304 HP) has 26 more horse power than 2006 Holden Caprice. (278 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 2006 Holden Caprice.
Because 2006 Holden Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Holden Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (438 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Holden Caprice. (350 Nm). This means 2006 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Holden Caprice.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Impala | 2006 Holden Caprice | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Impala | Caprice |
Year Released | 2006 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5326 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 304 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 438 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |